We have learned that there are two types of sugyot in the Talmud: amoraic sugyot and talmudic, or “stama” sugyot. Both kinds of sugyot usually have both amoraic and stama sources, but the relationship between the two components is very different in each case. Amoraic sugyot can be easily identified, because they are based on a series of amoraic memrot that are presented in chronological sequence, and the stama sources in amoraic sugyot appear before, in between and after amoraic sources. In such sugyot, the amoraic sources on their own will constitute a clear order and meaning. On the other hand, stama sugyot have no such chronological sequence among the amoraim that are quoted, because the memrot of the Amoraim are imported as evidences or challenges for stages in the stama discussion.

What is the role of stama d’talmuda in amoraic sugyot?

First, stama d’talmuda presents earlier sources. The stama may ask initial questions or describe a given situation or case to which the earlier source is going to relate. In actuality, the earlier source predates the stama d’talmuda. The stama is placed before the earlier source as a didactic aid in an oral lesson, or in a transcription of the oral lesson, to help us understand the context of the earlier source. However, it can be that the stama wants to present the source in a given light, or in the context of a given understanding, for purpose of later analysis in the sugyah. Therefore, it is necessary to learn the source being presented on its own, and to then determine if the talmud’s presentation is merely a formality, or if it intends to contribute something of substance to the understanding of the source.

The second purpose of stama d’talmuda in amoraic sugyot is to interpret the sources. A memra may present an halachic decision without rationale or justification. The stama will usually add the logic or interpretation of the memra. This allows the different halachic opinions of the amoraim to be compared and contrasted conceptually, which in turn allows the stama to generalize and abstract the memrot for extrapolation.

The third purpose of stama d’talmuda in amoraic sugyot is to extrapolate from a specific amoraic opinion or case to other hypothetical cases, in order to measure consistency of a given Amora, or the general applicability of his decision. This form of stama in the amoraic sugyah is usually the longest and the most complex, sometimes even constituting the majority of the sugyah!

The three functions of stama in the amoraic sugyah can give the impression that the entire sugyah is one fluid presentation of argumentation. Only by scanning and careful separation of the amoraic sources from the stama can we learn each component properly. Why does the stama d’talmuda so encompass the amoraic sources? It appears that the sugyot as we have them are protocols, or even stenographies, of lessons given orally. In these lessons, the earlier sources are studied in the context of a running explanation of the teacher in Aramaic. The stama was required before, during and after the amoraic sources to allow the students to fully comprehend the sources themselves, and their importance for the analysis which the teacher wanted to present. Today, beginning students are unfamiliar with Aramaic, and it is therefore worthwhile to learn the Hebrew-language tannaitic and amoraic sources before study of the stama layer.

Back to the reading section